Dubai vs Saudi Arabia for Tokenisation: Where Should You Launch Your Real Estate or Gold Offering First?

A strategic, regulator-first comparison for sponsors choosing between two of the Middle East’s most important digital asset markets

The question we hear every week

It usually comes at the end of a call.

After the sponsor has explained the vision:

“We want to tokenise a real estate portfolio.”
“We’re launching a gold-backed digital product.”
“We’re building an asset tokenisation platform for the GCC.”

Then they pause and ask:

“Should we start in Dubai or Saudi Arabia?”

It sounds like a simple jurisdiction choice.

It isn’t.

It’s a strategic decision that determines your regulatory burden, timeline, investor profile, credibility, and long-term scalability.

Because although Dubai and Saudi Arabia sit just a short flight apart, their tokenisation logic is fundamentally different.

Dubai feels like: fintech innovation first

Saudi feels like: capital markets regulation first

Neither is “better.”

But one may be better for you, depending on:

• asset type
• investor base
• timeline
• risk tolerance
• funding strategy

This guide breaks down the reality, not the marketing  of tokenisation in Dubai vs tokenisation in Saudi Arabia, specifically for real estate tokenisation and gold/commodity tokenisation.

So you can choose correctly the first time.

Two Cities. Two Philosophies.

Before we talk about rules, understand the mindset.

Because regulators reflect culture.

Dubai

Built as:

• a financial innovation hub
• sandbox-friendly
• tech-forward
• fast-moving

Saudi Arabia

Built as:

• an institutional capital market
• rule-based
• conservative
• documentation heavy

That philosophical difference shows up everywhere in tokenisation.

Dubai asks:

“How can we enable innovation safely?”

Saudi asks:

“How does this fit into existing securities law?”

Neither is wrong.

But they lead to very different experiences.

The Regulators That Matter

Let’s anchor the two supervisory regimes.

Saudi Arabia

Supervised by:
Capital Market Authority

Focus:
Securities law, investor protection, enforceability

Dubai

Supervised by:
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority

Focus:
Virtual asset activities, licensing frameworks, operational oversight

This distinction is subtle, but critical.

Saudi Arabia regulates the instrument.

Dubai regulates the activity/platform.

That changes everything.

The Core Difference in One Sentence

Here’s the simplest way to think about it.

Saudi:

Tokenisation = securities offering with digital register

Dubai:

Tokenisation = licensed virtual asset activity

If you understand this line, you already understand 80% of the strategy.

Real Estate Tokenisation: Dubai vs Saudi

Let’s start with the most searched phrase in the region:

real estate tokenisation Middle East

Because this is where most sponsors begin.

The Dubai approach

Dubai is comfortable with:

• digital asset platforms
• sandbox environments
• exchange-style models
• token marketplaces

You typically:

• obtain a licence
• operate a platform
• list tokens
• onboard investors

It feels like fintech infrastructure.

Great for:
platforms
marketplaces
early-stage innovation
testing concepts

The Saudi approach

Saudi Arabia doesn’t view tokenised property as “platform activity.”

It views it as:

 a securities issuance

So regulators expect:

• SPV ownership
• formal offering structure
• disclosures
• private placement or prospectus
• institutional-grade documentation

It feels like:
a fund or REIT issuance with digital plumbing.

Great for:
✔ serious capital
✔ institutional sponsors
✔ large asset portfolios
✔ credibility with banks/family offices

Visual Comparison : Real Estate Strategy

Dubai

Platform → licence → tokens → investors

Saudi

Property → SPV → securities → investors → tokens

One is tech-first.

One is structure-first.

Which is better for property sponsors?

If you are:

A tech startup building a marketplace

Dubai may feel easier initially.

A developer/fund with SAR 300M+ assets

Saudi is often stronger because:

• investors trust the framework
• banks are comfortable
• regulators understand securitisation logic

Institutional capital prefers Saudi’s conservatism.

Retail experimentation prefers Dubai’s flexibility.

Gold & Commodity Tokenisation: Where It Gets Interesting

Now let’s talk about gold tokenisation in the GCC.

Because this is where many sponsors get confused.

Gold feels like a commodity.

So many assume:
“Dubai is better.”

But legally, once fractionalised, gold often becomes:

 an investment contract or asset-backed security

Which suddenly looks very Saudi.

Dubai’s commodity tokenisation feel

Dubai:

• licences vault operators and platforms
• regulates activity
• focuses on operational compliance

Feels like:
“run a compliant virtual asset business”

Saudi’s commodity tokenisation feel

Saudi:

• focuses heavily on ownership
• custody
• redemption enforceability

Feels like:
“structure this like securitisation”

Which institutional investors often prefer.

Because custody + legal enforceability matter more than platform design.

The Institutional Credibility Factor (Underrated)

Here’s something rarely discussed publicly.

Family offices and large funds think differently from startups.

They don’t ask:
“What’s the coolest platform?”

They ask:
“Would a regulator defend this structure?”

Saudi’s heavy documentation approach often signals:

• seriousness
• enforceability
• legal clarity

Which attracts larger check sizes.

Dubai often wins.

Saudi often wins trust.

Depending on your capital strategy, one matters more.

Speed vs Certainty: The Trade-Off

Let’s be honest.

Dubai usually feels:
✔ faster
✔ lighter
✔ more flexible

Saudi usually feels:
✔ slower
✔ more formal
✔ more demanding

But here’s the twist.

Projects structured correctly in Saudi rarely face surprises later.

Dubai projects sometimes require restructuring when scaling institutionally.

So the real trade-off is:

Speed now vs certainty later

Smart sponsors choose based on their growth plan.

The “Wrong First Move” We See Too Often

Many teams:

Launch in Dubai → build traction → then enter Saudi

And discover:

“The Saudi regulator treats this completely differently.”

Which means:

• redrafting structure
• new documentation
• sometimes rebuilding

Had they designed with Saudi logic first, Dubai would have been easier.

But not always the other way around.

A Smarter Strategy We Often Recommend

For serious sponsors, we often suggest:

Option A : Institutional-first (Saudi)

Structure properly
Raise institutional capital
Then expand

Option B : Platform-first (Dubai)

Test product
Prove tech
Then institutionalise

There’s no universal answer.

But clarity beats assumptions.

Decision Framework: Where Should You Start?

Ask yourself:

1. Who are your investors?

Retail → Dubai
Institutional → Saudi

2. What are you issuing?

Platform access → Dubai
Asset-backed securities → Saudi

3. How big is the raise?

Small pilot → Dubai
Large structured capital → Saudi

4. What matters more?

Speed → Dubai
Regulatory credibility → Saudi

Your answers usually make the decision obvious.

The CRYPTOVERSE Perspective

At CRYPTOVERSE, we operate across both ecosystems.

What we’ve learned:

Dubai is excellent for:
innovation and platforms

Saudi is exceptional for:
institutional-grade capital markets

So we don’t ask:
“Which is cooler?”

We ask:
“Where will regulators and investors feel most comfortable?”

Because comfort = capital.

And capital is the goal.

Not tech elegance.

The Bigger Picture

Over the next decade, both markets will grow.

Dubai will remain:
the innovation lab

Saudi will become:
the institutional powerhouse

Many sponsors will eventually need both.

The key is sequencing them intelligently.

If You’re Evaluating Tokenization in the GCC…

Whether you’re:

tokenising real estate
issuing gold-backed instruments
building asset-backed securities
expanding regionally

Choosing the wrong first jurisdiction can cost months.

Choosing the right one accelerates everything.

Ready to Plan Your Entry Strategy?

At CRYPTOVERSE Legal, we help sponsors:

• compare Dubai vs Saudi regulatory pathways
• design jurisdiction-first structures
•  prepare VARA and CMA compliant models
•  structure real estate & commodity tokenisation
• execute cross-border strategies

We don’t sell hype.

We design structures regulators approve.

Because in the GCC:

Regulatory clarity wins capital.

Every time.

Let’s talk

If you’re deciding where to launch your tokenisation project first, Dubai or Saudi Arabia, we’re happy to walk through:

• your asset
• your investors
• your timeline
• your risk appetite

and recommend the smartest path.

FAQs