The world of virtual assets is rapidly evolving, and regulatory bodies like the Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) are at the forefront of ensuring that this evolution happens within a framework of safety and compliance. One of the intriguing aspects of VARA’s regulatory framework is the differentiated share capital requirements for broker-dealer services Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), especially concerning custody services. This article delves into why VARA imposes lower share capital requirements for broker-dealer VASPs providing custody services and higher ones for those not providing custody services. To understand this, we must first define custody services as per the VARA Custody Rulebook and explore the underlying regulatory rationale. 

What are Custody Services? 

According to the VARA Custody Rulebook, custody services involve the safekeeping of virtual assets on behalf of clients. The services ensure that the virtual assets are held securely, with strict controls to prevent unauthorized access, loss, or theft. Key aspects of custody services include: 

  1. Segregation and Control: Broker-Dealer VASPs providing custody services must segregate client assets in separate Virtual Asset (VA) wallets and maintain control over these assets at all times. 
  1. VA Wallet Management: This includes managing hot and cold storage, secure key generation, and storage procedures. 
  1. Client Agreements: Custody agreements must detail the custodial framework, risk mitigation strategies, and procedures for the safekeeping and return of assets. 

The stringent operational requirements for providing custody services highlight the critical role these services play in the virtual asset ecosystem. 

The Regulatory Framework: Share Capital Requirements. 

  1. Lower Share Capital for Custody Services: 

For Broker-Dealer VASPs providing custody services, VARA mandates a lower share capital requirement: the higher of AED 400,000 or 15% of fixed annual overheads. This lower requirement might seem counterintuitive, given the direct handling of client assets. However, several factors justify this approach: 

  1. Enhanced Operational Controls: Custody services come with stringent operational controls and regulatory oversight. VASPs must comply with detailed rules on segregation, control, and management of virtual assets, which mitigates the inherent risks. 
  1. Mandatory Insurance and Security Measures: VASPs providing custody services are often required to maintain additional insurance policies and adopt industry best practices for security. These measures provide additional layers of protection, reducing the financial risks associated with custodial activities. 
  1. Frequent Audits and Compliance Checks: Custody service providers are subject to regular audits and compliance checks by VARA, ensuring ongoing adherence to high standards of security and risk management. 
  1. Higher Share Capital for Non-Custody Services. 

For Broker-Dealer VASPs not providing custody services, the share capital requirement is significantly higher: the higher of AED 600,000 or 25% of fixed annual overheads. This higher requirement can be attributed to the following reasons: 

  1. Broader Risk Exposure: Broker-Dealer VASPs involved in activities other than custody might engage in trading, brokerage, or other financial services that introduce broader market and operational risks. The higher share capital ensures that these entities have sufficient financial buffers to absorb potential losses or regulatory fines. 
  1. Systemic Risk Mitigation: Higher capital requirements for non-custody services help mitigate systemic risks in the virtual assets market. By ensuring that these Broker-dealer VASPs are well-capitalized, VARA aims to enhance market stability and protect investors from adverse events. 
  1. Incentivizing Best Practices: By imposing higher capital requirements, VARA encourages non-custody Broker-Dealer VASPs to adopt robust risk management practices and maintain strong financial health, which are essential for long-term market integrity. 

The Rationale Behind Differentiated Requirements. 

  1. Risk Management and Operational Integrity: 

The primary rationale for VARA’s differentiated share capital requirements lies in the nature of risks associated with custody and non-custody services. Custody services, while involving direct handling of client assets, are governed by strict regulatory controls and operational safeguards. These include mandatory segregation of assets, prohibition of rehypothecation, and comprehensive wallet management protocols. The rigorous regulatory framework mitigates the risks, allowing for a lower share capital requirement. 

In contrast, non-custody services encompass a wider range of activities with varied risk profiles. These activities might not have the same level of direct regulatory oversight as custody services, necessitating a higher share capital to ensure financial resilience. The higher capital requirement acts as a financial buffer, protecting the market and investors from potential risks associated with these activities. 

  1. Encouraging Market Participation and Competition: 

Another important consideration is the promotion of market participation and competition. By setting lower capital requirements for custody services, VARA aims to encourage more entities to enter this crucial segment of the virtual assets market. Increased participation in custody services enhances the overall security and robustness of the market, providing clients with more options for secure asset storage. 

On the other hand, the higher capital requirement for non-custody services ensures that only well-capitalized and financially stable entities can operate in these areas. This helps maintain a high standard of service and reduces the likelihood of market disruptions caused by undercapitalized players. 

  1. Balancing Regulation with Innovation: 

VARA’s approach also reflects a balance between stringent regulation and fostering innovation in the virtual assets space. Custody services are foundational to security and trust in the virtual assets market. By imposing lower capital requirements, VARA facilitates innovation and growth in this area while maintaining high operational standards through rigorous oversight. 

For non-custody services, the higher capital requirements ensure that innovative activities are supported by robust financial structures. This balance helps create a secure yet dynamic environment for the development of new virtual asset services and products. 

To conclude, VARA’s differentiated share capital requirements for Broker-Dealer VASPs providing custody services versus those not providing such services are rooted in a nuanced understanding of risk management, market dynamics, and regulatory balance. The lower share capital requirement for custody services reflects the stringent operational controls and regulatory oversight in place, which mitigate the risks associated with handling client assets. Conversely, the higher capital requirement for non-custody services ensures that these entities have sufficient financial resilience to absorb potential risks and protect the market. 

This regulatory framework not only enhances market stability and investor protection but also encourages innovation and competition in the virtual assets space. By fostering a secure and dynamic environment, VARA is paving the way for the sustainable growth of the virtual assets market in Dubai and beyond. 


As the leading legal advisory firm for Blockchain, Web3, and Crypto startups in the UAE, we provide unmatched professional legal advice to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape of digital assets and the licensing process of the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) of Dubai. From legal structuring, company registration to handling intricate legalities of token launch, NFTs and tokenization, our dedicated team ensures your ventures thrive without any regulatory issues. Dive deeper into how we can empower your blockchain ambitions—visit today and partner with us to revolutionize your projects! 


The article is provided solely for educational and informational purposes and does not, under any circumstances, constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. The information herein is not intended to serve as a substitute for professional consultation. Readers are strongly encouraged to engage the services of competent professionals in the legal, financial, or tax fields to obtain advice pertinent to their specific situation before undertaking any action based on the content of this article. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *