The rise of virtual assets has ushered in a new era of digital finance, and with it, a diverse array of service providers collectively known as Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). New Zealand, recognizing both the potential and the risks inherent in these digital assets, has developed a robust regulatory framework to oversee VASPs. This article provides an in‑depth analysis of the various types of VASPs recognized under New Zealand law, the range of virtual asset activities they perform, and the specific regulatory obligations imposed on them.

Defining Virtual Assets and VASPs

A virtual asset is defined as a digital representation of value that can be traded or transferred electronically and may be used for payment or investment purposes. Bitcoin, for instance, is one of the most recognized virtual assets. Virtual Asset Service Providers, or VASPs, encompass any entity that offers services related to virtual assets. These services include, but are not limited to, facilitating virtual asset exchanges, providing digital wallet services, brokering transactions, and conducting initial coin offerings (ICOs).

In November 2019, it was highlighted that virtual assets are particularly vulnerable to misuse for money laundering and terrorist financing, given their inherent anonymity and global reach. The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) serves as the primary AML/CFT supervisor for VASPs in New Zealand, ensuring that such entities adhere to strict regulatory standards.

Categories of VASPs in New Zealand

New Zealand regulators recognize five primary categories of VASPs, each characterized by distinct activities and operational mandates:

  1. Virtual Asset Exchanges:
  1. Core Function: These platforms provide digital online environments where virtual asset transfers and exchanges occur.
  2. Activities: Exchanges may involve trading between different virtual assets or between virtual assets and fiat currency. Some exchanges also issue their own virtual assets to facilitate transactions.
  3. Regulatory Focus: Given their role as financial intermediaries, exchanges are subject to stringent AML/CFT obligations, including customer due diligence and transaction monitoring.
  4. Virtual Asset Wallet Providers:
  1. Core Function: Wallet providers offer secure digital storage solutions for virtual assets or fiat currency on behalf of customers.
  2. Activities: These providers facilitate the safe custody of assets and often support the transfer or exchange of digital assets.
  3. Regulatory Focus: Due to the custodial nature of their services, wallet providers must implement robust security measures and AML/CFT controls.
  4. Virtual Asset Broking:
  1. Core Function: Broking services involve the arrangement of transactions between buyers and sellers of virtual assets.
  2. Activities: Brokers act as intermediaries, facilitating exchanges between virtual assets and fiat currency, or between different types of virtual assets.
  3. Regulatory Focus: Broking activities are closely scrutinized for fair dealing and transparency, with obligations to report suspicious transactions.
  4. Initial Coin Offering (ICO) Providers:
  1. Core Function: ICO providers are involved in the issuance and sale of virtual assets to the public, often to raise capital for new projects.
  2. Activities: ICOs may include aspects of both asset issuance and the provision of investment opportunities. Providers must ensure that all promotional materials and disclosures are accurate and not misleading.
  3. Regulatory Focus: Depending on the structure, ICOs may trigger additional requirements if the tokens are deemed to be financial products, including the need for a registered Product Disclosure Statement (PDS).
  4. Providers of Investment Opportunities in Virtual Assets:
  1. Core Function: These entities offer vehicles for investing in virtual assets, which may include managed investment schemes, derivatives issuance, or private equity vehicles.
  2. Activities: Investors contribute funds or virtual assets with the expectation of receiving returns based on the performance of the underlying digital assets.
  3. Regulatory Focus: As with managed investment products, providers must adhere to stringent disclosure, reporting, and supervisory requirements.

Regulatory Obligations for VASPs

VASPs operating in New Zealand face a comprehensive set of regulatory requirements, designed to safeguard the integrity of the financial system while fostering innovation. Key obligations include:

  1. AML/CFT Compliance: VASPs are mandated to implement a risk-based approach to counter money laundering and terrorist financing. This includes verifying customer identities, monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, and reporting to the Department of Internal Affairs.
  2. Reporting and Disclosure: Providers must maintain detailed records of transactions and financial activity. Transparency is paramount, particularly for exchanges and ICO providers where misleading statements could lead to severe legal consequences.
  3. Registration and Licensing: Depending on the nature of the services provided, VASPs may need to register under the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008 and, in certain cases, obtain specific licenses to operate legally.
  4. Fair Dealing Obligations: Under the FMC Act, VASPs must ensure that all communications, marketing materials, and public disclosures are not misleading or deceptive. This is critical in maintaining investor confidence and market integrity.

The Supervisory Role of the DIA and FMA

In most instances, the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) is the primary supervisor for VASPs, given their classification as financial institutions under the AML/CFT Act. However, in certain cases, depending on the nature of the financial services provided, the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) may assume supervisory responsibilities. This dual oversight ensures that both the operational and financial aspects of virtual asset services are rigorously monitored.

Challenges and Best Practices for VASPs

While the regulatory framework in New Zealand is robust, it also presents challenges for VASPs, particularly as the industry evolves rapidly. Best practices for providers include:

  1. Robust Internal Controls: Implementing comprehensive AML/CFT procedures and continuous risk assessments to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  1. Transparent Disclosures: Ensuring that all statements regarding the nature, value, and backing of virtual assets are substantiated with clear evidence.
  1. Legal and Regulatory Review: Engaging experienced legal counsel to regularly review business practices and update compliance protocols in line with evolving regulations.
  1. Investor Education: Proactively informing clients and investors about the inherent risks and limitations associated with virtual asset transactions, thereby fostering a well‑informed investor base.

How Cryptoverse Can Help

At Cryptoverse, we specialize in providing expert legal guidance tailored to the unique challenges faced by Virtual Asset Service Providers. Whether you operate an exchange, a wallet service, or are planning an ICO, our legal team can help ensure that your business remains fully compliant with New Zealand’s rigorous regulatory framework. Moreover, assists in obtaining crypto licences in the UAE and other crypto‑friendly jurisdictions, empowering you to expand your operations globally with confidence.

Back to list
Older VARA Requirements for Virtual Asset Transfers, Exchange & Settlement Services in Dubai