What Is the Paid-Up Capital for a VARA Licence? A Practical Guide for Crypto Businesses

If you are planning to launch a crypto business in Dubai, one of the first financial questions you will eventually ask is:

What is the paid-up capital for a VARA licence?

It sounds like a simple question.
But under the VARA framework, the honest answer is:

It depends on the specific VA Activity you are applying for, how your operating model is structured, and in some cases how high your fixed annual overheads are. VARA’s paid-up capital rules sit in the Company Rulebook – Part VI: Capital and Prudential Requirements, and the thresholds are expressly set by activity rather than by one universal VASP number.

That distinction matters because many founders still approach Dubai licensing as though there were:

• one standard capital threshold,
• one standard crypto licence,
• and one standard financial readiness test.

That is not how the VARA framework works.

A VARA licence is activity-based, and so is the paid-up capital requirement. VARA’s public Licensed Activities page makes clear that the regime is built around distinct regulated VA activities, and the Company Rulebook then attaches prudential expectations, including paid-up capital, to those activities.

This article is designed to answer the question properly for founders, exchanges, custodians, brokers, transfer businesses, token issuers, and other digital asset operators searching for:

• VARA paid-up capital
• paid-up capital for VARA licence
• VARA capital requirements
• crypto licence Dubai capital
• VASP capital requirements Dubai
• VARA licence cost Dubai
• Exchange licence capital VARA
• Custody licence capital VARA

The most important thing to understand at the start is this:

Paid-up capital is not the same thing as the application fee, and it is not the full prudential burden either.

It is one — very important — part of the wider capital and prudential framework.

1) What “paid-up capital” means under the VARA framework

Under the VARA regime, paid-up capital is part of the baseline prudential expectation for licensed VASPs.

The current Company Rulebook – Part VI includes:

• B. Paid-Up Capital
• C. Net Liquid Assets
• D. Insurance
• E. Reserve Assets
• F. Notifications and other Requirements. VARA’s rulebook structure therefore treats paid-up capital as one prudential component among several, not as the only capital question a VASP needs to think about.

That matters because a lot of founders still ask:

“How much capital do we need to show at filing?”

The better question is:

“What paid-up capital must we hold and maintain under the rulebook, and how does that fit into the wider prudential regime?”

That is the more accurate regulatory question.

Rule VI.B of the Company Rulebook says a VASP must hold and maintain paid-up capital at all times at the required level for its licensed VA Activity. It also states that where a VASP is licensed for more than one activity, it must hold the required paid-up capital for each activity and calculate that amount using the fixed annual overheads for that activity.

So before you even look at the numbers, the first major lesson is already clear:

Paid-up capital is activity-specific, ongoing, and cumulative where multiple activities are licensed.

2) Why there is no single paid-up capital figure for “a VARA licence”

A lot of businesses still ask for “the VARA paid-up capital requirement” as though it were one number.

But VARA does not regulate one generic crypto licence. It regulates VA Activities.

Its public materials identify the key regulated activities, including:

• Advisory Services,
• Broker-Dealer Services,
• Custody Services,
• Exchange Services,
• Lending and Borrowing Services,
• VA Management and Investment Services,
• VA Transfer and Settlement Services,
• and Category 1 VA Issuance. VARA’s licensing and rulebook structure then assigns different prudential expectations to those different activities.

That means the paid-up capital answer depends first on:

1. which activity you are applying for, and
2. whether your activity uses approved custody arrangements or a separate VARA-licensed custodian, where the rulebook makes that distinction.

This is one reason early activity classification matters so much.

If the business misunderstands its own activity scope, it can also misunderstand:

• the application fee,
• the supervision fee,
• the paid-up capital requirement,
• and the wider prudential burden.

That is how budget assumptions start going wrong very early.

3) Paid-up capital by activity: the practical numbers founders need to know

The clearest source here is Rule VI.B – Paid-Up Capital in the current Company Rulebook. That rule sets the paid-up capital requirement for each licensed activity.

Here is the practical breakdown.

Advisory Services

For Advisory Services, the required paid-up capital is:

AED 100,000.

This is the lightest headline capital threshold in the core activity set and reflects the relatively lower prudential intensity of a pure advisory model compared with activities involving client assets, execution, or settlement.

Broker-Dealer Services

For Broker-Dealer Services, the required paid-up capital is:

• the higher of AED 400,000 or 15% of fixed annual overheads, where the business uses a VASP licensed by VARA to provide custody services or is otherwise approved during the licensing process; or
• the higher of AED 600,000 or 25% of fixed annual overheads, in all other instances.

This is an important example because it shows that the capital burden is not determined only by the activity label. It is also shaped by the structure of the operating model — especially around custody arrangements.

Custody Services

For Custody Services, the required paid-up capital is:

the higher of AED 600,000 or 25% of fixed annual overheads.

That higher threshold makes sense. Custody sits close to direct client-asset protection risk, so the prudential expectation is naturally more serious than for lighter-touch activities.

Exchange Services

For Exchange Services, the required paid-up capital is:

• the higher of AED 800,000 or 15% of fixed annual overheads, where the exchange uses a VASP licensed by VARA to provide custody services or is otherwise approved during the licensing process; or
• the higher of AED 1,500,000 or 25% of fixed annual overheads, in all other instances.

This is one of the most commercially important numbers in the framework. It shows clearly that an exchange licence is not only a higher-fee licence, but also one of the heaviest prudential classes in the regime.

Lending and Borrowing Services

For Lending and Borrowing Services, the required paid-up capital is:

the higher of AED 500,000 or 25% of fixed annual overheads.

That figure reflects the additional risk involved in models that expose clients or the platform to lending, counterparty, and return-of-assets obligations.

VA Management and Investment Services

For VA Management and Investment Services, the required paid-up capital is:

• the higher of AED 280,000 or 15% of fixed annual overheads, where the business uses a VARA-licensed custodian or otherwise approved custody arrangement; or
• the higher of AED 500,000 or 25% of fixed annual overheads, in all other instances.

Again, the custody structure affects the capital position, which is why structuring decisions can have major financial consequences.

VA Transfer and Settlement Services

For VA Transfer and Settlement Services, the required paid-up capital is:

the higher of AED 500,000 or 25% of fixed annual overheads.

This is one of the best examples of why founders should not confuse lower application fees with a light overall regulatory burden. Transfer and Settlement sits in the lower application-fee tier, but its paid-up capital threshold is still substantial.

4) What about Category 1 VA Issuance?

For Category 1 VA Issuance, the Company Rulebook does not give one flat number in Rule VI.B. Instead, it says the paid-up capital is as specified in the VA Issuance Rulebook or any Annex thereto.

That means token issuers in the Category 1 bucket need to go one level deeper into the issuance framework.

The current VA Issuance Rulebook provides additional capital requirements, including:

• for FRVAs, paid-up capital equal to AED 1,500,000 plus 2% of the value of available supply of the FRVA; and
• for ARVAs, paid-up capital equal to at least the higher of AED 1,500,000 and 2% of the average market value of the reserve assets, where applicable.

This is extremely important for token issuers because it means Category 1 issuance can carry a capital burden that is materially different from the other core service activities. Token founders should therefore never assume that “token issuance” is prudentially lighter just because it sounds different from exchange or custody.

5) Why “higher of fixed amount or percentage of overheads” matters so much

One of the most important practical features of the VARA capital framework is that many activity classes are not based only on a flat number.

Instead, they use a “higher of” formula:

• a fixed minimum amount, or
• a percentage of fixed annual overheads.

This matters because two businesses applying for the same activity can end up with different paid-up capital obligations depending on:

• team size,
• infrastructure cost,
• office and operating expense,
• technology burn,
• external-vendor spend,
• and the overall scale of the planned operation.

In practical terms, that means a more ambitious build can drive a higher prudential requirement.

This is one reason founders should not build a Dubai budget around the headline minimum amount alone. The fixed minimum is only one side of the formula. If your fixed annual overheads are higher, the percentage test may push your capital requirement well above the flat minimum.

That is not a flaw in the framework. It is part of the prudential logic. VARA is trying to align required capital not only to the licence label, but to the real operational footprint of the business.

6) If you have multiple activities, the capital burden grows

Another point that is often missed is what happens when a VASP carries on more than one activity.

Rule VI.B states that where a VASP is licensed to carry out more than one VA Activity, it must hold the amount of paid-up capital required for each activity, and it must calculate the paid-up capital required for each using the fixed annual overheads for that activity. The VASP must also reconcile its paid-up capital at least monthly.

This matters because many modern crypto businesses are hybrids.

For example, a business may combine:

• brokerage and transfer,
• exchange and custody,
• management and custody,
• or token issuance with another licensable service layer.

In those cases, the capital burden is not automatically simplified into one combined number. The multi-activity structure itself can increase the prudential requirement.

That is one more reason why accurate activity scoping matters before launch. A business that casually broadens its service scope may unintentionally create a much heavier capital requirement than the founders originally budgeted for.

7) Where and how paid-up capital must be held

Paid-up capital under VARA is not just a paper threshold.

Rule VI.B also says that paid-up capital must, at all times, be held and maintained in one of the following forms:

• a trust account with a licensed bank in the UAE, with VARA stated as the beneficiary;
• a surety bond furnished by a surety company authorised to conduct business in the UAE, with no end date and VARA stated as beneficiary; or
• any other manner specified by VARA when granting the licence.

This is a very practical point.

It means the capital requirement is not merely theoretical or accounting-based. The funds or equivalent capital support must be maintained in an approved and controlled form. That can have significant treasury, banking, and liquidity implications for the applicant.

So when founders ask:
“Do we just need to show this number on paper?”

the answer is no.
The rulebook expects the capital to be properly held and maintained.

8) Paid-up capital is not the only prudential requirement

One of the biggest misconceptions in the market is to equate paid-up capital with the full prudential burden.

That is incorrect.

As noted earlier, Part VI – Capital and Prudential Requirements includes not only paid-up capital, but also:

• Net Liquid Assets
• Insurance
• Reserve Assets
• and Notifications and other Requirements.

That means a business asking:
“What is the paid-up capital for a VARA licence?”

should really understand that this is only one prudential layer.

For example:

• Net Liquid Assets must be maintained at a level such that the surplus of current liquid assets over current liabilities is at least 1.2 times monthly operating expenses, and NLA must be reconciled daily and reported monthly.
• Insurance must be maintained in forms appropriate to the size and complexity of the business, including professional indemnity, directors’ and officers’, and commercial crime insurance for relevant cases.
• Reserve Assets may be required at 100% of liabilities owed to clients, held on a 1:1 basis in the same VA, depending on the model.

So while paid-up capital is a central number, it is not the whole answer to the prudential-readiness question.

9) Why founders often underestimate the capital burden

There are a few common reasons why businesses underestimate paid-up capital under VARA.

They focus only on the application fee

That is the easiest number to find, but it is not the prudential number. VARA’s fee schedule and capital rules are separate layers of the framework.

They assume one activity when the model actually involves several

Multi-activity businesses can increase the capital requirement materially.

They ignore the overhead-based calculation

The “higher of” formula means fast-scaling or infrastructure-heavy businesses may need more capital than the flat minimum suggests.

They treat capital as a launch-only issue

The rulebook requires paid-up capital to be held and maintained at all times, not just shown during the application.

They treat token issuance as a simpler case

Category 1 issuance can carry serious additional capital requirements under the issuance framework.

These are exactly the kinds of misunderstandings that can turn a seemingly manageable Dubai plan into a much heavier financial project.

10) The practical founder question is not “what is the number?” but “what does our model trigger?”

By now, the right way to think about paid-up capital should be much clearer.

The real practical question is not just:

“What is the paid-up capital for a VARA licence?”

It is:

“What paid-up capital does our specific activity or combination of activities trigger under the rulebook, and can our model support that prudentially?”

That is the useful question because it forces the business to think about:

• activity classification,
• custody structuring,
• operating scale,
• fixed overheads,
• and whether the business is building something prudentially credible for Dubai.

That is also why two businesses can both be “crypto firms” and yet face very different capital realities.

An advisory-led model is not an exchange.
A transfer rail is not a custody business.
A Category 1 issuer is not a simple utility-token project.
And a multi-activity platform is not financially equivalent to a single-activity startup.

Final takeaway

If you want the shortest accurate answer to:
“What is the paid-up capital for a VARA licence?”

it is this:

There is no single paid-up capital number for a VARA licence. The requirement depends on the specific VA Activity, and in many cases it is the higher of a fixed AED threshold or a percentage of fixed annual overheads. The clearest source is Rule VI.B – Paid-Up Capital in the current Company Rulebook.

As a practical summary:

• Advisory Services — AED 100,000
• Broker-Dealer Services — AED 400,000 / 15% with approved custody, or AED 600,000 / 25% otherwise
• Custody Services — AED 600,000 or 25%
• Exchange Services — AED 800,000 / 15% with approved custody, or AED 1,500,000 / 25% otherwise
• Lending and Borrowing Services — AED 500,000 or 25%
• VA Management and Investment Services — AED 280,000 / 15% with approved custody, or AED 500,000 / 25% otherwise
• VA Transfer and Settlement Services — AED 500,000 or 25%
• Category 1 VA Issuance — see the VA Issuance Rulebook, where FRVA and ARVA capital rules can go materially beyond the generic activity table.

And just as importantly:
Paid-up capital is only one part of the wider prudential framework, which also includes net liquid assets, insurance, reserve assets, and ongoing notification obligations.

How CRYPTOVERSE Legal Can Help

At CRYPTOVERSE Legal Consultancy, we help founders, exchanges, custodians, brokers, transfer businesses, token issuers, and other digital asset operators assess what paid-up capital their specific VARA activity scope is likely to trigger, and how that fits into the wider prudential burden of operating in Dubai. Our support includes activity classification, prudential impact analysis, Category 1 issuance capital assessment, structuring guidance, Regulatory Business Plan support, and broader VARA licensing strategy.

If you want tailored guidance on the paid-up capital your business may need for a VARA licence, and how that requirement fits into your overall Dubai launch strategy, contact CRYPTOVERSE Legal Consultancy to discuss your regulatory strategy.

FAQs